CDN vs. Edge Computing: Differences and Use Cases

Speed, availability, and reliable user experiences are critical in the video streaming industry – live streaming, live shopping, VOD, or User-Generated Content. Consequently, technologies like Content Delivery Networks (CDN) and Edge Computing have emerged as crucial components to address these needs. However, many people get confused when they hear “CDN vs. Edge Computing” and wonder if they’re the same or completely different!

While both CDN and Edge Computing aim to deliver content and services closer to the end-user, they are fundamentally different in their architectures and use cases.

This article will dive deep into CDN and Edge Computing to understand why they were developed, their architectures, and real-world use cases. 

Let’s go! 

History: From Centralized Servers to CDNs and Edge Computing

Centralised Servers: Traditionally, digital service providers depended on centralised servers for hosting and distributing data to their users. In this model, no matter where a user was located, requests had to travel long distances back to the central server, which could result in latency and slow load times. 

With the explosion of the Internet, the inadequacies of this model became evident. As users from around the globe tried to access popular websites, servers faced unprecedented traffic, leading to downtimes and reduced service quality. This necessitated the evolution of our infrastructure. 

CDN or Content Delivery Networks: CDNs were introduced in the late ’90s to counter these challenges. Their primary function was to cache popular content across strategically located servers worldwide. Now, wherever a user is located, the content can be brought to them quickly by querying the CDN’s network of caching servers instead of querying the central server. 

Edge Computing: However, a CDN was nothing more than a fast-responding storage on the cloud and could not do any meaningful computing. In response to this computing demand from the rise of Internet of Things (IoT) devices and the demand for real-time processing, the world of Edge Computing came to the fore. 

While CDNs and Edge Computing originated as answers to the Internet’s evolving demands, they address distinct challenges with varying architectures.

Content Delivery Networks (CDN): A Closer Look

CDNs work by strategically placing a network of servers across various geographical locations, aiming to distribute the load of delivering content. When a user requests specific content, the request is redirected to the nearest CDN server instead of being routed to the central server (which could be thousands of miles away).

Having a local copy of the requested content, this cache responds swiftly, reducing the time to fetch the content and improving the overall user experience.

Each server in a CDN replicates the content from the origin server. This replication ensures that even if one server fails, the content remains accessible from other locations. 

cdn vs. edge computing
How does a CDN work?

CDNs are particularly beneficial for websites that experience spikes in traffic or have a global user base. For instance, streaming platforms like Netflix or YouTube rely heavily on CDNs to ensure users can access videos with minimal buffering, regardless of location.

If you want more information about how a CDN works or how a CDN solves the Thundering Herd problem, please head on to our CDN deep-dive on OTTVerse.

Furthermore, CDNs not only improve speed but also enhance security. Many CDNs offer Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) protection by dispersing the traffic and identifying and absorbing malicious requests. Major industry players like Akamai, Cloudflare, and Fastly provide CDN services, reflecting the significance and demand of this technology in today’s digital ecosystem.

In this article, we’ve explained why a CDN is critical for VOD streaming and Live Streaming – be sure to read them to understand why your service should be using a CDN!

Next, let’s move on to Edge Computing to better understand the CDN vs. Edge debate!

Edge Computing: Pushing Boundaries Beyond the Centralized Cloud

The simplest way to understand edge computing is to understand that it defines (rather, redefines) where computation takes place.

Traditional cloud computing models hinge on sending data from the device to a centralised cloud server for processing. Once processed, the data is sent back to the device. While this is computationally efficient, the round-trip travel can introduce latency. Edge Computing, however, brings computation closer to the data source – often directly onto the device or a local server.

Related:  CDN Cache Hit Ratio and Cache Miss Ratio Explained

Consider the architectural nuances. An Edge Computing setup typically consists of edge devices (like IoT devices, sensors, or user-end devices) and edge servers or gateways. These edge servers could be on-premises or located at a nearby data centre, but they’re distinctively closer to the source of data generation. 

The rationale is simple: processing data locally can achieve faster response times and reduce the load on central servers and network bandwidth.

cdn vs. edge computing
Edge Computing | Credit: Wikipedia

Let’s illustrate with some industry examples:

  1. Healthcare: Medical devices require instantaneous data processing, especially in critical care settings. Think of wearable heart rate monitors or insulin pumps. With Edge Computing, these devices can process data in real time, making split-second decisions that could be life-saving. Sending this data to a centralised cloud for processing could introduce life-threatening delays.
  2. Manufacturing: In intelligent factories, equipment is outfitted with numerous sensors collecting data on everything from machine health to production efficiency. Edge Computing allows for immediate data analysis, enabling predictive maintenance (identifying machine failures before they happen) or adjusting machine parameters on the fly for optimal production.
  3. Automotive: Modern vehicles, especially autonomous cars, generate tremendous amounts of data every second. Processing this data in real time is essential for functions like collision avoidance. With Edge Computing, data from cameras, sensors, and LIDAR can be processed directly within the vehicle, ensuring immediate response to changing road conditions.

I hope this has given you a good idea about how edge computing works. Let’s dwell on it for a little more to drive home the architectural distinction between edge and traditional cloud computing.

Edge vs. Traditional Cloud Computing: Drawing Distinctions

While Edge Computing and cloud computing offer remote data processing capabilities, their application and impact differ. In a conventional cloud setup, scalability and centralised management are the primary advantages. Cloud servers are equipped to handle massive datasets, making them ideal for large-scale analytics and storage. The trade-off, however, is latency, especially when devices are geographically distant from cloud servers.

Edge Computing, in contrast, excels in scenarios where low latency and rapid response are crucial. By positioning processing capabilities closer to the data source, Edge reduces the time data spends in transit. This decentralised approach, while limiting raw processing power compared to massive cloud servers, offers unparalleled speed in real-time decision-making.

To visualise the difference, imagine watching a live sports match. While cloud computing might be excellent for analysing the entire game’s statistics and patterns post-match, Edge Computing is what allows cameras to instantly replay the last goal from multiple angles without a hitch.

Finally, CDN vs. Edge Computing Explained

Finally, we look at the differences between CDNs and Edge Computing across different parameters and use cases. This table shows the critical distinctions and similarities between CDNs and Edge Computing.

AspectCDNEdge Computing
Primary ObjectiveSpeed up web content delivery by reducing latency.Process data closer to the source to reduce latency.
ArchitectureNetwork of geographically distributed servers.Local processing on devices or nearby edge servers.
Use CasesWeb content delivery, video streaming, web application acceleration.Real-time processing for IoT, healthcare devices, autonomous vehicles, etc.
Data HandlingCaches and delivers content.Processes and may store data.
BenefitsReduced load times, DDoS protection, global content distribution.Reduced load times, DDoS protection, and global content distribution.
ScalabilityScales by adding more server nodes to the network.Scales by adding processing capabilities at the edge.
SecurityProvides security through traffic dispersion, DDoS protection, and content encryption.Can enhance security by processing sensitive data locally, reducing exposure.
ExamplesIt may involve costs for edge devices, local servers, and data transfer.Wearable health devices, smart factories, autonomous vehicles.
LatencyReduced latency in content delivery.Reduced latency in data processing.
Integration with CloudTypically integrates with cloud services for content sourcing and updates.It can enhance security by processing sensitive data locally, reducing exposure.
Cost ModelOften based on bandwidth usage and number of requests.Real-time data processing, reduced cloud traffic, and bandwidth efficiency.

It’s essential to note that while they have distinct primary functions, their complementary nature means that they often coexist within the same ecosystem, working in tandem to optimise both content delivery and data processing.

In conclusion, while Edge Computing and CDNs aim to reduce latency, they address different facets of the digital landscape. CDNs optimise content delivery for better user experience, while Edge Computing reshapes where and how data processing occurs.

if you are interested in video, check out our extensive video streaming and encoding coverage.

krishna rao vijayanagar
Krishna Rao Vijayanagar

Krishna Rao Vijayanagar, Ph.D., is the Editor-in-Chief of OTTVerse, a news portal covering tech and business news in the OTT industry.

With extensive experience in video encoding, streaming, analytics, monetization, end-to-end streaming, and more, Krishna has held multiple leadership roles in R&D, Engineering, and Product at companies such as Harmonic Inc., MediaMelon, and Airtel Digital. Krishna has published numerous articles and research papers and speaks at industry events to share his insights and perspectives on the fundamentals and the future of OTT streaming.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Enjoying this article? Subscribe to OTTVerse and receive exclusive news and information from the OTT Industry.